Electoral Integrity and Democratic Resilience in Nigeria: ElectionManagement, Political Competition and Public Confidence.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60782/83jjfr31Keywords:
Electoral Integrity, Democratic Resilience, Election Management, Political Competition, Public ConfidenceAbstract
Electoral integrity is central to democratic resilience because credible elections provide citizens withmeaningful opportunities to choose leaders and hold governments accountable. In Nigeria, recurringconcerns over electoral administration, political competition, electoral violence, vote-buying, misinformation and declining public confidence continue to challenge democratic consolidation. This
article examines the relationship between election management, political competition and public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic process. The study adopts a qualitative research design based ondocumentary analysis and secondary data drawn from peer-reviewed literature, academic books, institutional reports, electoral documents and election observation materials, with particular attention to the 2019 and 2023 general elections. The data were purposively selected and subjected to thematic analysis guided by the Electoral Integrity Perspective and Democratic Resilience Theory. The analysis focuses onadministration, procedural fairness, transparency, credibility, institutional impartiality and compliance withelectoral rules, alongside institutional capacity, management of electoral disputes, resistance to political pressure, peaceful competition and public confidence. Evidence was triangulated across academic, institutional and independent sources to enhance analytical credibility. The findings indicate that institutional reforms, particularly technological innovations and improvements in electoral procedures, have strengthened aspects of election administration but have not eliminated concerns regardingtransparency, electoral violence, political interference and implementation gaps. The study further finds that intense political competition can undermine electoral integrity when political actors prioritize electoral victory over democratic rules. The article concludes that strengthening electoral integrity requires sustainedinstitutional independence, transparent procedures, accountable political competition and greater public confidence in electoral institutions.