Populism, Political Elites and Democratic Representation in Nigeria: Rethinking the Relationship Between Popular Discontent and Institutional Politics.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60782/4p7dap76Keywords:
Populism, Political Elites, Democratic Representation, Popular Discontent, African PoliticsAbstract
Populist politics has become increasingly visible in contemporary African political competition, particularly where citizens express dissatisfaction with political elites and the performance of representative institutions. This article examines how such dissatisfaction creates space for populist mobilization and how populist politics shapes democratic representation in Nigeria and selected African contexts. The study draws on the ideational approach to populism, elite theory and representative democracy theory. Methodologically, it uses qualitative documentary analysis of peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, institutional reports and other credible secondary sources selected for their relevance to populism, elite politics and democratic representation. Nigeria provides the main context of analysis, while experiences from South Africa, Uganda and other African countries are used to provide broader contextual insight rather than as formally matched comparative cases. The evidence is examined thematically, with particular attention to popular discontent, elite accountability, political mobilization, representation and institutional responses. The findings suggest that corruption, inequality, economic hardship, weak accountability and limited responsiveness can deepen perceptions of a gap between citizens and political elites, creating conditions for populist mobilization. Populist actors can bring neglected grievances into public debate and give greater visibility to groups that feel politically excluded. However, claims to represent the “real people” may also weaken political pluralism and challenge institutional checks when political authority becomes concentrated. The article therefore argues that the democratic implications of populism depend largely on the institutional environment through which popular demands are expressed, mediated and constrained.