Social Research Traditions and the Relevance of Methodological Triangulation
Keywords:
Methodology, Social research, Tradition, Triangulation, RelevanceAbstract
For researchers in the social sciences, when to combine the quantitative and
qualitative methods is an issue. This is either because they do not understand the
relevance, are more favourably disposed to one, or believe the methods are
incompatible. Such dispositions deny the researchers and end users of empirical
studies rich information. The objectives of this paper are to lay bare the limitations
of using one research methodology, and sensitize social scientists on the benefits
of combining social research methodologies. The paper discusses the research
traditions and the quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and goes on to look
at the limitations of each of the traditions and methodologies. It also discusses the
relevance of combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies which includes
enabling a social researcher overcome biases and deficiencies of any one method
and thus capitalize on their individual strengths; allowing a researcher to produce
a fuller account of the situation that covers not only the scales of the issue such as
numbers involved, but also gives some insight into the motivational factors that
gave rise to the behavior; and increasing the validity of results by incorporating
several viewpoints. In addition, methodological triangulation aids in sampling –
information from one method can be used as the basis for selecting a sample of
people who will participate in the research through a different and contrasting
method. It also provides a researcher with the opportunity to check the findings
from one method against the findings from a different method. The paper
concludes that methodological triangulation is relevant because it enriches social
research findings as it provides in-depth information; thus, it recommends
methodological triangulation for social researchers. However, the paper cautions
that the decision to use methodological triangulation should be guided by how
useful it is in addressing a particular question, issue or problem that is being
investigated.