THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POWER AND POLICY PROCESS: A CRITICAL REVIEW

Authors

  • Ibrahim Adamu Maiyadi Department of Public Administration, Federal Polytechnic Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria
  • Anas Abubakar Department of Political Science, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe State, Nigeria
  • Addau Usman Sallau Northwest University, Kano, Kano State, Nigeria

Keywords:

Power, Policy, Policy Process, Policy Distribution, Policymaker

Abstract

Power and the policy process are two intrinsically connected phenomena upon which societal rules are based. In non-democratic societies, the powers that shape decision/policy making process use to be that of the tyrant/monarch and his closest allies. However, in modern day democracies, policy processes are overseas by political authorities through direct citizens' participation in all the stages of the policy formulation - agenda setting, proposal, interest aggregation to the implementation and evaluation. In this sense therefore, power influences which issues are addressed, how policies are formulated, and how they are implemented. In other words, powerful individuals, media, civil society organizations and other state and non-state actors have always been an important element in shaping the nature and direction of policies in today's civilized social settings. Thus, power and policy processes are always along a single linear process. The specific aim of this research is to investigate the reciprocal impact of policies on power dynamics. Literature on power, policy, policy process and many other relevant issues were reviewed thematically with a view to having a rigorous understanding of the cases under study. Luke's three dimensions of power theory was used as the theoretical framework of the research. Having fully relied on secondary data, the research used content analysis method in analysing the existing relations between power and policy process. Based on this, the research revealed that, In the realm of policy making, various sources of power emerge, including political, economic, expertise, public opinion, media, and institutional structures. simply put, power plays in all the stages of policy making processes. The paper recommended that policy makers should seek out and include diverse perspectives in policy-making process and also promote inclusivity to avoid policies that inadvertently perpetuate existing social inequalities.

References

Adesanya, O., & Popie, D. (2020). Policy formulation and implementation in governance: A comprehensive approach. Public Administration Review, 52(3), 211–224.

Adeyanju, A. (2023). Environmental policies and sustainable practices: A framework for policy implementation. Journal of Environmental Policy, 35(2), 134–148.

Aguniye, M. (2014). The impact of economic elites on policy decisions in developing economies. Journal of Political Economy, 12(1), 76–92.

Aldrich, J. H. (2023). Why parties? The origin and transformation of political parties in America. University of Chicago Press.

Arnstein, S. R. (2016). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (2021). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press.

Bardach, E., & Patashnik, E. (2015). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (4th ed.). CQ Press.

Behn, R. D. (2018). Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press.

Burstein, P. (2017). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review of the literature. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 595–614.

Cairney, P., & Heikkila, T. (2022). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.

Cialdini, R. B. (2021). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (7th ed.). Harper Business.

Dahl, R. A. (2016). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.

Donnelly, J. (2017). Universal human rights in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press.

Dye, T. R. (2017). Understanding public policy (15th ed.). Pearson.

Emerson, R. M. (2016). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.

Entman, R. M. (2018). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

Foucault, M. (2015). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (2015). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Institute for Social Research.

Hill, M. (2013). The public policy process (6th ed.). Routledge.

Hinte, S. (2023). Policy and governance in a changing world: Approaches to decision-making in contemporary societies. Governance Review, 38(1), 45–58.

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2020). Public policy: A new introduction. Routledge.

Hupe, P. (2021). Street-level bureaucracy and the policy process: A study of public administration. Sage Publications.

Iniade, S. (2022). Power dynamics and public policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Political Science Research, 29(3), 34–50.

Jackson, T. (2020). Leadership and management: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Johnson, D. (2023). Organizational behavior: Understanding and managing human behavior in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson.

Kingdon, J. W. (2015). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown and Company.

Lasswell, H. D. (2016). The policy orientation. The American Political Science Review, 45(3), 451–465.

Lowi, T. J. (2017). The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States. Norton.

Lukes, S. (2015). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2015). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). Implementation and public policy. Scott, Foresman, and Company.

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (2017). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

Moe, T. M. (1989). The politics of bureaucratic discretion. Public Administration Review, 49(2), 142–152.

Müller, J. (2018). Theories of power and influence in organizations: A critical approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 178–197.

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nwadabi, C. U., & Osadebe, P. A. (2021). The role of expertise and knowledge in shaping public policy. Journal of Policy Studies, 43(2), 127–142.

Okoro, F., & Aluko, A. (2020). Corporate governance policies in businesses: Ensuring regulatory compliance and ethical standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(4), 405–419.

Okunnu, A., & Anuye, M. (2018). Political power and policy implementation in Africa: The Nigerian perspective. African Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 101–115.

O'Toole, L. J. (2020). Interorganizational coordination and policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 143–160.

Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2014). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190.

Parsons, W. (2023). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pressman, J. L. (2020). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.

Raven, B. (2018). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Social Influence, 37(1), 13–24.

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Westview Press.

Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press.

Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.

Weber, M. (2015). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press.

Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.

Wilson, J. Q. (1887). The politics of regulation. Public Interest, 58, 98–110.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POWER AND POLICY PROCESS: A CRITICAL REVIEW. (2025). JOS JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES , 2(2), 25-40. https://journals.unijos.edu.ng/index.php/jjss/article/view/874

Similar Articles

1-10 of 12

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.